{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreianp6akovpq3dhbrntfaeqlbjoiih4jr5kavex5wioiynvd6klc6a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mo6e7kouqwz2"
  },
  "path": "/t/badge-or-trophy-system-for-rlhf-like-system/1383564#post_2",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-13T12:46:22.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "tags": [
    "@DysTopia."
  ],
  "textContent": "Thanks for sharing this, @DysTopia.\n\nI actually think the distinction you're making is the interesting part here: not just \"more feedback,\" but a feedback vocabulary that captures _why_ a response was useful.\n\nExamples like **Semantic Fidelity** , **Continuity** , **Patch Note Honesty** , and **Batch Integrity** are much more actionable than a simple thumbs up/down because they point to specific behaviors users want reinforced. It could also help surface the fact that different people value different collaboration styles, whether that's precision, creativity, formatting discipline, transparency, or context retention.\n\nI've gone ahead and logged this feedback so the team can review it. No promises on implementation, of course, but it's a thoughtful proposal and one that approaches feedback from a different angle than most feature requests.\n\n-Mark G.",
  "title": "Badge or Trophy System for RLHF-Like System"
}