{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiaqvzgpfl57eahzyt4giyjo2jqlblzkfa77cacqxla2knc6pknge4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mo5clukoeot2"
  },
  "path": "/t/flexible-rate-limit-resets-for-codex-and-a-method-to-get-a-reset/1383470#post_8",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-13T02:15:56.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "tags": [
    "@VeitB"
  ],
  "textContent": "@VeitB Thanks for looking into this, I have had similar frustrations. Do us a favor though, please consider renaming this post to smth that doesn’t use the ambiguous term “plus”. Or at least not “codex plus”. Codex plus is obviously a thing… Thanks, and keep 'em on their toes!  Peace from your friendly Irish grammar-casual-observer, Paul, living in Heidelberg",
  "title": "Flexible Rate Limit Resets for Codex and a method to get a Reset"
}