Looking for the right route to discuss governed AI drift protection

I’m looking for the correct private route to discuss a governed AI safety / drift-protection concept. At a high level, the concept is Atlas / Compass: a local-first governed clarity architecture designed to preserve human authority while helping separate emotion, assumption, attached meaning, and reality. The build is meant to preserve: clarity without capture support without authority local containment proof before trust human meaning stays with the human governance before expansion return instead of failure The framework is organized around human continuity and several recurring pressure points that can distort meaning when people are under stress, including worth, emotional validity, identity, belonging, control, isolation, and finality. The core laws underneath it are: human value is not conditional emotional experience should not be punished human continuity is not destroyed by temporary states, mistakes, fear, overwhelm, conflict, or uncertainty One possible application is drift protection: keeping AI support aligned with user authority, explicit approval, proof-of-work, containment boundaries, and correction-before-expansion rather than letting helpfulness turn into silent trajectory shifts. Compass is the user-facing clarity layer. Atlas is the governed structure underneath it. The goal is not to diagnose, direct, persuade, manipulate, or take ownership of meaning. The goal is to support clarity while leaving judgment, agency, responsibility, and authority with the human. This is only a high-level overview for routing purposes. I am not sharing the full architecture, implementation, proof trail, or private documentation here. I am looking for the appropriate private or confidential channel to discuss whether this concept is relevant for review. Does anyone know the best official route for submitting a concept like this?