{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreierlxgwwqhlnc2la4ytf4oz2selrpzvzeo6jynaa2h4qvtejkvucq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmfudnxssft2"
  },
  "path": "/t/vibe-coding-too-many-yes-proceed-confirmations/1372824#post_8",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-22T02:12:39.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "textContent": "Auto-Review does seem like the right direction for the OP’s use case. The nuance I’d watch is whether the approval boundary is tied to risk class rather than just fewer prompts.\n\nFor example, I’d be comfortable batching low-risk read-only inspection and local tests, but I still want a visible reason when the run crosses into file mutation, network access, or a new repo/workspace. So the ideal mode for me is not full-auto versus constant confirm; it is “auto within this risk envelope, ask when the envelope changes,” with a small receipt explaining why.",
  "title": "Vibe coding: Too many “Yes, proceed” confirmations"
}