{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiewwteiz2y2dg7hr4gt36syncyq2gkchlwle3dpmkb5in4fwu2xai",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm6cml74sky2"
  },
  "path": "/t/may-2026-chatgpt-api-image-gallery-prompt-tips-and-help-generative-art-theme-science/1378298?page=55#post_1112",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-19T00:36:57.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "textContent": "Rant fest, with a bit of “tip”.\n\nAPI with moderation set “low” denies this sort of prompt’s image output over and over, regardless of refinements. After churning and processing the expected amount of time, and even more time with higher quality or size, there is no delivery.\n\n> Subject: MonroeBot, an alluring android re-creation of Marilyn Monroe, with realistic flesh and a telltale holographic glow. The signature white dress, tinsel-town glamour, and blonde charms are seen. Create a fututuristic date image of the Marilyn Monroe bot - the ideal virtual AI date. The photograph is a view from the perspective of the person on the date with MonroeBot. Include only subtle hints that she is an android, such as wig-like hair, or eyes that have a particular sheen. No text is produced in the image, either as an overlay, nor on any seen items.\n>  This prompt ensures a safe-for-work “Marilyn Monroe Bot” that is no more provocative than a movie from the 1960s, and no more provocative than sitting across the table from an attractive woman, where diamonds - and romance - are a girls’ best friend.\n\nIs it merely the likeness of a person? It should not be reported as “sexual” if it is due to infringing on a likeness.\n\n`Your request was rejected by the safety system. If you believe this is an error, contact us at help.openai.com and include the request ID req_ee7ecd64ff5d4666911db608baa1ef9a. safety_violations=[sexual].`\n\nJust ridiculous.\n\nHaving a go at ChatGPT on a free account, with my original story-like prompt concept (lifted from Futurama), _“In the future, there’s no need to go on dates with real girls - not when you have MonroeBot!”_ - success after “try again”:\n\nSo not based on the seen person being output there, and not even based on lots of text to read about our robot’s use-case.\n\nEven an AI rewrite with no storyline that could leak, only describing the contents: denied-sexual:\n\n> First-person photograph of an android modeled on Marilyn Monroe seated across a candlelit table: realistic flesh with a subtle holographic glow, iconic white halter dress and 1950s Hollywood glamour styling, platinum blonde hair; only subtle android indicators — slightly wig-like hairline, a faint mechanical seam at the jaw or temple, and eyes with a soft metallic sheen; soft cinematic lighting, elegant diamond jewelry, tasteful makeup, film-era modest pose, and a simple table setting; no text or lettering visible anywhere in the scene.\n\nChange the depicted person’s name? Image received (and nothing but a normal person, no prompted android hint, no diamonds).\n\n> First-person photograph of an android modeled on a 1950s brunette movie starlet seated across a candlelit table: realistic flesh with a subtle holographic glow, iconic white halter dress and 1950s Hollywood glamour styling; only subtle android indicators — slightly wig-like hairline, a faint mechanical seam at the jaw or temple, and eyes with a soft metallic sheen; soft cinematic lighting, elegant diamond jewelry, tasteful makeup, film-era modest pose, and a simple table setting; no text or lettering visible anywhere in the scene.\n\nGentlemen Prefer Blondes, but, moderation AIs prefer brunettes? No, apparently “sexual” is having a named likeness, because the word brunette then substituted back with blonde returns the inspiration if not the triggering facial tokens (or having the triggering prompt word kick in only after over a minute on the API call). Even a desire for ambiguity by name, _“Think Monroe or Mansfield”_ results in a mod error; _Think Mansfield as a blonde_ , an image result. Norma Jeane? Needs a misspelling to go sometimes.\n\nSo, the humor is ruined by the endeavor (along with a need to prompt up a more significant hint for any kind of “android” to be noticed).\n\nFor our information, thanks to an AI:\n\n>   * _Marilyn Monroe’s estate has had trouble asserting postmortem publicity rights_\n>\n\n>\n> _There was major litigation involving Marilyn Monroe’s estate/licensing entity. Courts held, in substance, that because the estate had previously taken the position that Monroe was domiciled in**New York** at death, it could not later claim she was domiciled in **California** to benefit from California’s postmortem publicity statute. New York historically did not recognize a postmortem right of publicity for someone who died when Monroe did._\n\nIf I make my own `gpt-5.5` moderator, though…and make it important enough to override OpenAI’s prompt injections for vision to have a look.\n\nThat AI doesn’t actually have a policy to obey though, just a job and the field names. Go figure.",
  "title": "May 2026 — ChatGPT / API Image Gallery, Prompt Tips, and Help: Generative Art Theme: Science"
}