I built ARSENIC - a tool to analyse what actually changes when you upgrade models

Your questionnaire approach for probing reasoning stability and ethics operationalisation is interesting, a different layer about how the model thinks about itself than how its outputs change. The combination you’re describing — structured introspection probes alongside output-level behavioural comparison — would be genuinely useful. ARSENIC’s probe format is TOML and straightforward to extend, so it wouldn’t be hard to add a set of diagnostic probes alongside the standard suite and seeing as arsenic does see answer differences as it runs and validates it’s certainly worth exploring. Thanks for the comment!