{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreierkf5tltmibeiz5wesxkomsspamfxc22irstilwfjwxb52f7qbjm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlsxou3fyyx2"
  },
  "path": "/t/projects-ux-feedback-continuity-of-thought-matters-more-than-feature-parity/1380923#post_1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-14T13:18:04.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "textContent": "I’d like to share some UX feedback after actively using ChatGPT Projects as a long-term thinking and knowledge management environment.\n\nThe core issue is not individual features, but “continuity of thought.”\n\nHere are the main friction points I experienced:\n\n  1. Inconsistent draft/input persistence between Web and App\n\n\n  * Web keeps unfinished input reliably\n\n  * App sometimes loses draft input\n\n\n\n\nThis creates a strong feeling of “thought interruption.”\nFor users doing long-form thinking or structured project work, draft persistence is critical.\n\n  2. UX inconsistency between Direct Chats and Projects\nExamples:\n\n\n  * Different reaction systems (e.g. “Nice”)\n\n  * Different interaction feeling\n\n  * Different lightweight behaviors\n\n\n\n\nFrom a user perspective, both are still “ChatGPT,” so behavioral differences create cognitive load.\n\n  3. Projects are evolving into knowledge workspaces\nProjects are not just folders.\nFor advanced users, they become:\n\n\n  * thinking environments\n\n  * structured knowledge systems\n\n  * iterative workflows\n\n\n\n\nIn that context, UX consistency becomes more important than adding isolated features.\n\nMy suggestion:\n“Unify the UX philosophy, optimize the UI per use case.”\n\nExamples:\n\n  * Consistent draft persistence everywhere\n\n  * Consistent interaction basics\n\n  * Preserve the deeper, focused nature of Projects without turning them into social/chat spaces\n\n\n\n\nOne more future-looking request:\nPartial conversation extraction / re-edit based migration between projects would greatly improve knowledge refinement workflows.\n\nIn short:\n“UX is not just usability — it is continuity of thought.”\n\nThank you for building this platform.",
  "title": "Projects UX Feedback: “Continuity of Thought” Matters More Than Feature Parity"
}