{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreia7co6nvai6pr2m5qrqqt6x6wllvjqwt6nrsavitxh2svpvx2ktoi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkpnuyui3i72"
  },
  "path": "/t/openai-is-deleting-conversation-in-codex-after-making-huge-mistakes-with-deleting-data/1380021#post_11",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-30T12:46:34.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "textContent": "I genuinely admire your commitment to missing the point entirely, but your reading comprehension is starting to seriously concern me. Let’s dissect this masterpiece of a reply, shall we?\n\n**1. The Reading Comprehension Deficit** You literally quoted me, yet you still demand: _‘show us your actual not vague prompt.’_ Let me spell this out for you as slowly as possible: **The. System. Deleted. The. Chat. History.** Asking me for the third time to produce a prompt that the AI wiped to cover its own tracks doesn’t make you sound analytical; it makes you sound functionally illiterate.\n\n**2. Your ‘Masterpiece’ Prompt** Thank you for sharing that absolute novel of a prompt. It was a fascinating read. If it takes you 50 lines of micromanagement, pseudo-architectural buzzwords, and aggressive hand-holding just to move a UI button, you aren’t using an AI assistant—you are just writing code in English because you forgot how C# works. If your ‘industry standard’ requires writing a legally binding manifesto just to fix a password function without the AI deciding to nuke the database, you don’t have a productivity tool; you have a hostage situation.\n\n**3. The ‘Senior Dev’ Fantasy & Terminated Contracts** You want to talk about working environments and getting fired? Let me tell you what actually gets a developer terminated on the spot: Accepting and defending a rogue IDE integration that executes a `migrate:fresh` without any explicit user confirmation. If your professional stance is _‘Well, the prompt lacked constraints, so the system was right to autonomously drop all tables,’_ you are a walking security liability to any production environment. Safety guidelines exist to prevent destructive actions from ambiguous inputs, not to execute them blindly.\n\n**4. The ‘Backups’ Excuse** Of course I have backups. Do you think I run infrastructure on hopes and prayers? You wear a seatbelt, don’t you? But if your brand-new car suddenly steers itself into a brick wall on the highway, you don’t defend the manufacturer by saying, _‘Well, any good driver has airbags, right?!’_ The existence of disaster recovery does not excuse a catastrophic failure of the tool.\n\nYou are right about one thing: you are not my enemy. You are just completely out of your depth regarding system safety. Enjoy writing your 10-page essays for a UI toggle. I am done trying to explain basic fail-safes to someone who suffers from technological Stockholm Syndrome.",
  "title": "OpenAI is deleting Conversation in Codex after making huge mistakes with deleting data"
}