Feature Request: Allow a fixed Ctrl+Enter send shortcut in Codex chat
Welcome to the forum!
You are welcome to post feature request here however the official place to request codex enhancements is the GitHub OpenAI Codex issues tab and use the label enhancement
In searching the issues with enhancement find:
github.com/openai/codex
Make ENTER insert newline in Codex TUI input (send on Ctrl+Enter instead)
opened 12:07PM - 18 Feb 26 UTC
smileBeda
enhancement TUI
What variant of Codex are you using? CLI ### What feature would you like t…o see? ### Summary Currently, the Codex CLI/TUI sends the prompt on ENTER and inserts a newline on Ctrl + J. While this matches traditional terminal behavior, the Codex TUI functions primarily as a multiline prompt editor rather than a classic shell. This keybinding choice conflicts with modern text-editing conventions and frequently leads to accidental submission of incomplete prompts. --- ### Problem In most contemporary tools (IDEs, chat interfaces, documentation tools, browsers, etc.): - ENTER inserts a newline - Ctrl + Enter submits content (or, alternatively, CMD + Enter) The Codex TUI reverses this expectation: - ENTER submits - Ctrl + J inserts newline This creates several usability issues: - Strong mismatch with established typing muscle memory - Frequent accidental submission of unfinished prompts - Cognitive friction when switching between Codex and other tools - Ctrl + J is non-standard and unintuitive for multiline entry In practice, this results in a high rate of unintended prompt submission. --- ### Proposed Change Adopt a text-editor-oriented interaction model: - ENTER → Insert newline - Ctrl + Enter or CMD + Enter → Submit prompt Alternatively, and MUCH BETTER - make this configurable: - Terminal-style mode (current behavior) - Editor-style mode (proposed behavior) - Define custom bindings (let user choose their combinations) --- ### Rationale The Codex TUI operates more like a structured prompt composition interface than a traditional command shell. Aligning keybindings with modern editor conventions would: - Reduce accidental submissions - Improve workflow consistency - Lower cognitive load - Better match user expectations in AI prompt composition contexts This change would improve usability without affecting core functionality. ### Additional information No response
If the matches what you seek then give the issue a thumbs up to let the OpenAI developers know this is important to you. If this does not match your desired request then look further or open a new issue with the label enhancement.
Also see:
Codex features are prioritized by votes in GitHub issues tab Codex
FYI We prioritize feature requests based on upvotes from the community. If a feature request doesn’t get enough upvotes, we’ll close it. It’s therefore important for a feature request to have a clear and compelling title and description. We also recommend that feature requests focus on the problem statement rather than a solution. Describe the use case and what problem you’d like to see solved. There are often multiple ways to address a given problem. Source Note: In GitHub feature request…
Discussion in the ATmosphere