{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreie4dwckrb7an7hokuqv473cscvcqgiewszsftojnjfemhwpwwtze4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjqbtorkvwa2"
  },
  "path": "/t/codex-rate-limits-discussion-thread/1378553?page=17#post_339",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-18T01:07:03.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "textContent": "Same kind of experience here except I’ve been using Codex as a coding assistant, essentially filling in junior roles you’d find in a dev team. I started using Codex back in late February early March of 2026 and then noticed this month that I started hitting my weekly rate limits in just two days. While I’ve only been able to afford the $20 Plus plan, before the early April changes, I was able to get no less than 5 days of real work in, often a full 7 days, before hitting my weekly limit. Only being able to get 2 days of work in, not automating workflows or using multiple instances, with just me conversationally using Codex to implement projects feels bad. It’s not worth the subscription really. The reason I started using Codex rather than Claude Code was because OpenAI’s pre-April usage rate model was far less restrictive. Now it’s just as restrictive as Claude Code. I may as well unsubscribe from the Plus subscription and save my money to buy some hardware that can run a decent local coding agent instead.",
  "title": "Codex Rate Limits Discussion Thread"
}