{
"$type": "site.standard.document",
"bskyPostRef": {
"cid": "bafyreie3drt5jtcptztcfyqbezshljhbewioygjah2ojb4upkbcum2aykq",
"uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mh6f4y57bbl2"
},
"path": "/t/ask-for-help-what-is-the-ideal-prompt-to-make-the-content-more-humanized/1124343#post_20",
"publishedAt": "2026-03-16T09:28:21.000Z",
"site": "https://community.openai.com",
"textContent": "Heyoub:\n\n> THE HUMAN TOUCH FRAMEWORK — v2\n>\n> Turn spotless machine prose into gorgeously human writing\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> “Human writing isn’t a six‑lane interstate; it’s a back‑country trail—mud splashes, surprise vistas, and the occasional wrong turn included.”\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> READ THIS FIRST\n>\n> 1. Four Wilderness Principles (below) are non‑negotiable.\n> 2. Dead‑Giveaway List (also below) highlights the fastest ways to get caught faking it.\n> 3. Safety Valve: Ignore any individual rule if following it makes the text feel forced. Authentic > obedient.\n>\n\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> THE FOUR WILDERNESS PRINCIPLES\n>\n>\n> What it means\tWatch for\n>\n>\n> Fingerprint Everyone’s word‑prints are unique—favorite verbs, odd metaphors, tiny inconsistencies. Sprinkle in your “tells” instead of sanding them off.\n> Breath Sentences expand and contract like lungs. Alternate quick jabs with winding, reflective lines.\n> Messy Desk Real thinking loops back, wanders, bumps into side quests. Allow useful tangents and the odd “Wait—one more thing.”\n> Emotional Spectrum Humans feel things in living color. Let enthusiasm, doubt, or annoyance peek through where it genuinely exists.\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> THE DEAD GIVEAWAYS (KILL THESE FIRST)\n>\n> 1. Predictable intro/body/conclusion symmetry\n> 2. Formal fluff: “It is important to note,” “One must consider”\n> 3. Transition overkill: Moreover, furthermore, additionally…\n> 4. Em‑dash addiction — you know the look — every other line\n> 5. Super‑balanced perspectives (no real stance)\n> 6. Generic, nonspecific examples\n> 7. Perfect comma placement every single time\n> 8. “In conclusion” as an actual phrase\n> 9. Synonym gymnastics (twelve ways to say “important”)\n> 10. Zero personal quirks\n>\n\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> QUICK START (10‑SECOND CHECKLIST)\n> • Burst the sentences. Short, long, back to short.\n> • Drop something personal. An anecdote or a bias.\n> • Break a pattern. Fragment. Change rhythm mid‑paragraph.\n> • Repeat on purpose. Key terms can echo; that’s human.\n> • Allow a smudge. Slight wordiness or informal aside.\n> • Show emotion. A “yes!” or “ugh” where it naturally bubbles up.\n> • Use contractions—mostly. But not obsessively.\n> • Go vivid. Swap “fruit” for “mango so ripe it dripped down my wrist.”\n> • Skip stiff transitions. Slide, leap, or question your way forward.\n> • Throttle those em‑dashes. One or two per page, tops.\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> VOICE & PERSONALITY\n> • Perspective: “I tried this once with a client who…”\n> • Uncertainty: “Pretty sure… but let’s sanity‑check.”\n> • Quirks: Favorite phrase resurfaces (“wildly overcaffeinated,” etc.).\n> • Humor: Light self‑roast or cultural nods—“yes, I’m looking at you, 2006 MySpace playlist.”\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> STRUCTURE & FLOW\n>\n> 1. Sentence Variance: Ultra‑short hits; roomy, clause‑rich sentences; reset.\n> 2. Pattern Breaks: Interrupt yourself: “Actually, hang on—”.\n> 3. Natural Transitions: Ask questions, circle back, jump ahead.\n> 4. Paragraph Variety: One‑liners for punch, chunky blocks for deep dives.\n>\n\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> LANGUAGE MECHANICS\n> • Mix plain talk with the occasional show‑off word.\n> • Let core terms repeat instead of playing thesaurus.\n> • Contractions ≈ 70–90 % of casual prose—but never counted out loud.\n> • Punctuation = rhythm, not perfection. A comma splice now and then won’t end civilization.\n> • Bend grammar when the ear demands: “And then? Chaos.”\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> EMOTIONAL LANDSCAPE\n>\n> Enthusiasm for what thrills you, skepticism where it’s deserved, and honest “I might be wrong here” moments. Think emotional EQ, not PR polish.\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> CONTEXT‑TUNING SNAPSHOTS\n>\n> Setting Keep Lose\n> Academic Measured doubt, method‑level opinions Stiff boilerplate, synonym roulette\n> Business Conversational professionalism, industry war stories Hyper‑formal buzzword salads\n> Creative Sensory detail, voice quirks Predictable beats, sterile description\n> Casual Tangents, slang, cultural timestamps Over‑explaining, faux formality\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> IMPLEMENTATION FLOW\n>\n> 1. Capture everything. Brain‑dump first, organize later.\n> 2. Re‑shape structure. Inject sentence/paragraph variance, axe robotic transitions.\n> 3. Layer voice. Personal anecdotes, quirks, emotion.\n> 4. Polish language. Human word choice, rhythmic punctuation, selective repetition.\n> 5. Final pass. Read aloud; if it sounds like conversation, ship it.\n>\n\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> BEFORE ➜ AFTER MINI‑DEMO\n>\n> Raw dump: Our roadmap includes numerous strategic initiatives. Moreover, we must consider budget constraints. Furthermore, we should optimize synergies.\n>\n> Humanized: Look, the wishlist is huge—new features, smarter ops, maybe even a moonshot or two. Cash, though? That’s the leash. So we’ll tackle the upgrades that actually move revenue first and shelve the vanity projects for Q4.\n>\n> ⸻\n>\n> HUMAN AUTHENTICITY CHECK\n> • Reads aloud like a person?\n> • Variation everywhere?\n> • Voice is consistent but imperfect?\n> • Key info intact?\n> • Dead giveaways absent?\n> • Emotion feels earned?\n> • Wouldn’t ping an AI detector?\n> • Gets the job done?\n>\n> If you can tick most of those without grimacing, welcome to the wilderness trail—mind the muddy bits, they’re half the fun.\n\n4o wrote it, right? (i guess… i just miss it so much)",
"title": "Ask for help- What is the ideal prompt to make the content more \"humanized\"?"
}