{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiauggvusy6kqbvvz6pridgtioso5uznwhznpzpideko3uzscqhy4y",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:kmwems6tpvudwvlxisswue6a/app.bsky.feed.post/3mny3fpyrs7h2"
  },
  "path": "/links/2026-06-10-f4446f0b",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-10T10:34:26.000Z",
  "site": "https://remysharp.com",
  "textContent": "The \"AI overview\" is its own content, not just a list of search results. This is really interesting and I would love to see this set the tone for other countries (::cough UK::). If enough of that wrong content defames companies or individuals, it could become a serious legal problem not just for Google but for other providers of similar services like ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity. Big Tech helped themselves to our content. The content bloggers put out on the web was always intended to be consumed freely, but it we didn't agree that you (Big Tech) could use it for massive profits without the least bit of credit (let alone royalties for the content being used). The big AI companies have harvested and thrown the web into their models without moderation causing all kinds of real-world harm, so this looks to be a positive step to forcing them to take some real responsibility. Source: the-decoder.com",
  "title": "Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answers [link]"
}