{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihvnhfjfw3hkoap6u2m2alsmibmjkfsxqoboufwvqtpkeosw76iqa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:klkgxrhct7epqznuvf6tawoy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhrhcqobg5d2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifpeu25ujfun2cfhxgimk3u55lubfj3nd4hl5c3abqnuopflijv2m"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 82894
  },
  "path": "/litigation/2026/03/former-immigration-judges-challenge-mspb-decision-on-their-terminations/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-23T22:26:40.000Z",
  "site": "https://federalnewsnetwork.com",
  "tags": [
    "All News",
    "Litigation",
    "Management",
    "Workforce",
    "Workforce Rights/Governance",
    "Brandon Jaroch",
    "civil service protections",
    "Civil Service Reform Act",
    "Department of Justice",
    "due process",
    "Gilbert Employment Law",
    "Kevin Owen",
    "Megan Jackler",
    "Merit Systems Protection Board",
    "Nathaniel Zelinsky",
    "Office of Legal Counsel",
    "Raymond Limon",
    "reduction in force",
    "Schedule Policy/Career",
    "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit",
    "Washington Litigation Group"
  ],
  "textContent": "A new appeal comes after the Merit Systems Protection Board asserted that DOJ’s firings of two immigration judges in 2025 were constitutionally permissible.",
  "title": "Former immigration judges challenge MSPB decision on their terminations"
}