{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig5j4m4veqtdigealt2funne333jlk3yqtkc2odmf6hlf3pbwhdwi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:klkgxrhct7epqznuvf6tawoy/app.bsky.feed.post/3meidyzhl6uv2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiarwbdwu2vn7d6lu5t3xk7m4kk2z7l7c4xqdcxop5szloaglxquzi"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 585443
  },
  "path": "/federal-report/2026/02/federal-employees-options-for-appealing-adverse-actions-headed-for-an-overhaul/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-09T23:47:47.000Z",
  "site": "https://federalnewsnetwork.com",
  "tags": [
    "All News",
    "Federal Report",
    "Management",
    "SES",
    "Unions",
    "Workforce",
    "Workforce Rights/Governance",
    "American Federation of Government Employees",
    "Civil Service Reform Act",
    "Everett Kelley",
    "Gilbert Employment Law",
    "Jenny Mattingley",
    "Kevin Owen",
    "Merit System Accountability and Compliance",
    "Merit Systems Protection Board",
    "Office of Personnel Management",
    "Partnership for Public Service",
    "probationary employees",
    "probationary period",
    "Reductions in force"
  ],
  "textContent": "Opponents of OPM's new proposed regulations raised concerns of the erosion of due process for federal employees, and the creation of conflicts of interest.",
  "title": "Federal employees’ options for appealing adverse actions headed for an overhaul"
}