{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihkujktdvapvrki4auh2se6nugnrk6xja53w7et4pbj75tnrode4q",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:jvtquacwpds4pvrhh2k4l3ft/app.bsky.feed.post/3mivyjjxuraw2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreicth3g2i3wykopfdokyizggat6ao3jkjc2alwydrvwmgabgkmnmt4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 37568
  },
  "path": "/blog/i-believe-in-human-websites-i-still-care-about-polish/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-07T14:30:12.375Z",
  "site": "https://www.kylereddoch.me",
  "tags": [
    "“Unpolished human websites”"
  ],
  "textContent": "## The tension I keep coming back to\n\nI recently read Joel’s post, “Unpolished human websites”, and it hit on something I think a lot of us who care about the independent web have felt for a while now.\n\n**He is not wrong.**\n\nPart of what makes personal websites interesting is that _they still feel like a person made them_. Not a content machine. Not a brand deck. Not a page built to satisfy search engines first and humans second. The weirdness, the rough edges, the posts that wander a little, the occasional typo, the oddly specific sidebar, the layout choice that maybe only makes sense to the person who built it. That is part of the charm. That is part of what makes the small web feel alive.\n\nI do not disagree with that at all.\n\nBut I also have a hard time fully relaxing into that mindset, and I know exactly why.\n\nI come from a web design and development background, and I also spent time around internet marketing. Once you have learned to look at a website through those lenses, it is very hard to stop noticing things. I catch myself looking at page structure, heading hierarchy, title choices, internal links, metadata, readability, grammar, and whether a post is actually giving someone a fair chance to find it later. That part of my brain does not really clock out.\n\nSo when I work on my own site, I end up living in the middle.\n\nOn one side, I want my website to feel like mine. Personal. Imperfect. Not overproduced. Not stripped of personality in the name of looking “professional.” I want it to have that indie-web feeling where you can tell there is an actual human being behind it.\n\nOn the other side, I still care about polish, and I do not think that automatically makes a site less human.\n\nI think there is a difference between polishing a site for people and polishing a site for systems.\n\nMaking a title clearer is not always selling out to SEO. Sometimes it is just helping the next person understand what they are about to read. Fixing grammar is not always sanding off personality. Sometimes it is respect for the reader. Adding structure does not have to mean becoming sterile. Sometimes it just means your ideas are easier to follow. Even SEO, in its best form, is not supposed to be trickery. At its core, it can simply be about making good work easier to discover.\n\nThat is the part I keep coming back to: **discoverability matters too**.\n\nBecause what is the point of writing something honest and human if nobody can ever find it unless they already know your name?\n\nI do not think the answer is to turn personal websites into optimized content farms. Far from it. I think that is exactly the kind of flattening Joel is pushing back against, and I get it. The web gets worse when every page starts sounding like it was run through the same checklist, tuned for the same algorithm, and polished until the person disappears.\n\nBut I also do not think the answer is to treat all polish like betrayal.\n\n> For me, the sweet spot is this: keep the voice human, keep the perspective personal, keep the weird edges that make a site feel lived in, but do not be afraid to care about clarity. Do not be afraid to care about presentation. Do not be afraid to make it easier for someone to read, navigate, and maybe even discover what you made.\n\nA human website does not have to be sloppy to be human.\n\nAnd a polished website does not have to be soulless.\n\nThat is probably why I still nitpick my own site. Not because I want it to feel corporate, but because I want the experience of reading it to feel intentional. I want it to sound like me, but I also want it to be readable. I want it to be personal, but I also want it to be findable. I want it to feel handcrafted, not careless.\n\nMaybe that is my version of the human web.\n\nNot perfect. Not optimized into oblivion. Not trying to win at search rankings or impress some imaginary content strategist. Just personal enough to feel real, and polished enough to show I cared.\n\nThat balance is probably different for everybody, and that is part of the beauty of it.\n\nThe best personal websites still feel like their owners.\n\nSome will be rougher. Some will be cleaner. Some will be chaotic. Some will be carefully structured. What matters most is that the person behind the site is still visible through it all.\n\nThat is the part worth protecting.",
  "title": "I Believe in Human Websites. I Still Care About Polish",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-31T19:00:00.000Z"
}