{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicmzpauiijtmnix2kikars2a5rmpch6miaocm7oaygzwtvmc6hfae",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:jpckpkvpjawehyqenhblotzo/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkuk4e3l6hp2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiduepbbtwebuffbaiykxtjiizfpbmpck7m74r5wnfljopsekxv6kq"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 97428
  },
  "path": "/latest/ihc-judges-transfers-trigger-major-seniority-shake-up-new-roster-issued/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-02T11:06:16.000Z",
  "site": "https://humenglish.com",
  "tags": [
    "Latest",
    "Pakistan",
    "IHC judges’ transfers trigger major seniority shake-up, new roster issued",
    "HUM News English"
  ],
  "textContent": "ISLAMABAD: The transfer of three judges from the Islamabad High Court has led to a significant reshaping of judicial seniority and administrative arrangements, with the court issuing a revised roster for the coming week.\n\nThe changes follow a decision by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan to transfer three sitting judges — Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kiani, Justice Babar Sattar and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz — to provincial high courts, a move that has already triggered legal and constitutional challenges from the legal fraternity.\n\n### Seniority order reshaped\n\nWith the departure of Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kiani, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan has now emerged as the senior-most judge in the Islamabad High Court after the chief justice.\n\nAccording to court officials, Justice Ejaz Ishaq Khan will remain second in seniority until new appointments or further transfers are made to the court.\n\nThe revised seniority structure has also led to changes in administrative responsibilities and bench formations, particularly for division benches that hear major constitutional, criminal and tax matters.\n\n### New judicial roster issued\n\nThe IHC registrar’s office has issued a new duty roster for the coming week, effective from April 4, under which seven single benches and four division benches will hear cases.\n\nThe updated roster reflects the reshuffled composition of judges following the transfers and will remain in force until further orders.\n\nCourt officials said the changes are aimed at ensuring continuity in judicial work despite the structural adjustments triggered by the transfers.\n\n### Division benches reconstituted\n\nUnder the new arrangement, four division benches have been constituted.\n\nA key division bench comprising Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Muhammad Asif will hear a broad range of cases.\n\nA second division bench, headed by Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan with Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, will specifically handle tax-related matters.\n\nA third bench consisting of Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro and Justice Muhammad Asif will hear criminal cases.\n\nA fourth division bench, comprising Justice Muhammad Azam Khan and Justice Raja Inam Amin Minhas, will hear cases of all categories.\n\nOfficials said Justice Muhammad Asif will also serve on multiple division benches, reflecting an expanded judicial workload under the revised schedule.\n\n### Background to transfers\n\nThe restructuring follows the Judicial Commission’s decision earlier this week to approve inter-high court transfers of judges by majority vote.\n\nUnder the decision, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kiani was transferred to the Lahore High Court, Justice Babar Sattar to the Peshawar High Court, and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz to the Sindh High Court.\n\nThe commission also ruled that any vacancies created by such transfers would be filled through further transfers rather than treated as fresh vacancies for initial appointments — a move seen as significant in shaping future judicial postings.\n\n### Legal and constitutional questions\n\nThe decision has drawn scrutiny from the legal community. The Lahore High Court Bar Association has already challenged the transfers in the Supreme Court, raising concerns over transparency and constitutional compliance.\n\nPetitioners have argued that the transfers lack stated reasons and may affect judicial independence, while also challenging recent constitutional amendments linked to judicial appointments and transfers.\n\nChief Justice Yahya Afridi had earlier expressed reservations during discussions on the proposal, warning that such transfers could raise constitutional questions and impact the balance between federal and provincial judiciaries.\n\n### Constitutional changes underpin move\n\nThe transfers come in the backdrop of amendments to Article 200, which now allow the Judicial Commission to recommend inter-high court transfers without the consent of the judges concerned — a departure from the previous requirement for consent.\n\nLegal observers say the changes have introduced a new framework for judicial mobility, but also triggered debate over institutional independence and administrative control within the superior judiciary.\n\n## Ongoing impact\n\nCourt officials say the immediate priority is to maintain the functioning of the Islamabad High Court, which continues to hear constitutional, criminal and civil matters despite the reshuffle.\n\nThe revised roster, they added, ensures that both single and division benches remain operational as the court adjusts to its new composition following one of the most significant judicial reorganisations in recent years.\n\nThe post IHC judges’ transfers trigger major seniority shake-up, new roster issued appeared first on HUM News English.",
  "title": "IHC judges’ transfers trigger major seniority shake-up, new roster issued"
}