{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigq6334lmjeqxvzsryttlhcpblknosxrujahay7w37vz2bat7noem",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:jo3wjj2gx46alocis4wubmwr/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjyrbznyh7f2"
  },
  "path": "/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2026-04-21/In_the_media",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-21T00:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://en.wikipedia.org",
  "tags": [
    "PDF\ndownload",
    "Mastodon",
    "LinkedIn",
    "Facebook",
    "X (Twitter)",
    "Bluesky",
    "Reddit",
    "in its current state",
    "ban cellphone usage during school time",
    "as noted",
    "GBH",
    "WBUR",
    "Boston Today",
    "Axios Boston",
    "a slightly different plan",
    "acknowledged",
    "\"shares Wikipedia's most overlooked articles\"",
    "\"Good News Podcast\"",
    "\"mulling whether to rename entry\"",
    "article",
    "an article",
    "\"AI bot gets banned from Wikipedia, then writes\nangry blogs protesting about it\"",
    "\"AI Agent Runs the 'I'm Being Censored' Playbook\nAfter Getting Banned from Wikipedia\"",
    "says",
    "reported",
    "\"trying to erase The Post and other outlets that\ndon’t align with their worldview\"",
    "\"At the end of each year, Wikipedia releases an\nannual traffic report through its own Wiki-centric news outlet\nThe Signpost...\"",
    "\"Wikipedia's rules have turned the great gift of\nfreedom against itself,\"",
    "interviewed",
    "a recent post for his blog",
    "it",
    "reminded us",
    "+ Add a comment",
    "add the page to your watchlist",
    "purging the\ncache",
    "Suggestions"
  ],
  "textContent": "Could Wikipedia be involved in Massachusetts' proposed social media ban for minors?: Another regulate-the-internet attempt casts a wide net.\n\n← Back to Contents\n\nView Latest Issue\n\n21 April 2026\n\n\n\n\n\nFile:Massachusetts House of Representatives 01.jpg\n\nLëa-Kim Châteauneuf\n\nCC BY-SA 4.0\n\n75\n\n450\n\nIn the media\n\n## Could Wikipedia be involved in Massachusetts' proposed social media ban for minors?\n\nContribute —\n\nShare this\n\n  * PDF\ndownload\n  * E-mail\n  * Mastodon\n  * LinkedIn\n  * Facebook\n  * X (Twitter)\n  * Bluesky\n  * Reddit\n\n\n\nBy Bri and Oltrepier\n\n###  Massachusetts House ban on social media could restrict minors from Wikipedia if their definition of social media is too broad\n\n\"So, does this mean I cannot cheat by going through Wikipedia pages the next time I need to write an essay on State institutions?\" - A Massachusetts kid somewhere, probably\n\nOn April 9, 2026, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed a bill, approved on a 129-25 vote, that would significantly restrict social media access by minors in the state; should the state Senate approve the law in its current state, parents would need to provide their consent for 14- and 15-year-olds to use social media, while platforms and social media companies would be required to implement age verification systems in order to prevent users under the age of 14 from having accounts. This would mark a significant jump-up from the Senate's original proposal, passed in July 2025, to just ban cellphone usage during school time, carving out exemptions for students with special needs.\n\nMassachusetts is hardly the first US state attempting to limit children's access to social media – in fact, it would be the 18th state, as noted by _The Boston Globe_ (behind paywall) – but the bill would mark one of the most restrictive policies in the entire country. The news has also been reported by other local media, including GBH, WBUR, Boston Today, and Axios Boston.\n\nAxios reporter Mike Deehan specifically focused on the risks that Wikipedia, among other platforms, would face should the bill come into effect as it is. The proposal currently defines a social media platform as any online service that \"displays content primarily generated by users and allows users to create, share and view user-generated content with other users.\" According to State Rep. Aaron Michlewitz, House Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, passages like this one were written in order to give State Attorney General Andrea Campbell flexibility in coming up with more specific regulations; however, digital rights group Fight for the Future argues that this definition is so broad it could force lots of sites with user-generated content, including YouTube, Roblox and even Wikipedia itself, to verify user ages.\n\nProfessor Timothy Edgar, who hosts lectures on cybersecurity and online privacy at Harvard Law School, told _Axios_ that \"what distinguishes [application of the law to] the big tech social media companies from the rest of the Internet [including Wikipedia] is not actually very clear,\" and that Mass. lawmakers would need to \"think very carefully about the ramifications of what that would mean for innovation on the Internet, and what that would mean for the openness and freedoms that we all enjoy.\"\n\nAnyway, the bill still needs to be examined and voted on by the Senate, which had focused exclusively on banning cellphones from classrooms, but the fate of the proposal is currently unclear: some politicians and organizations also raised concerns over the risk of retain of government IDs or biometric data by tech companies, outing LGBTQ+ status of minors to unsupportive families and incompatibility with First Amendment – which has been the subject of legal challenges to similar laws in Florida, Louisiana and Ohio. Plus, slight divisions have emerged within the local Democratic Party over the bill, as state Reps. Erika Uyterhoeven and Mike Connolly voted against it, whereas Governor Maura Healey has publicly unveiled a slightly different plan to curb children's access to social media in the state. – B, O\n\n### Wikipedia SEO, move over for GEO\n\nGenerative Engine Optimization (GEO), the new Search Engine Optimization (SEO)\n\n_Search Engine Land_ recently acknowledged that \"ironclad editorial guardrails\" at Wikipedia make it very hard for all sorts of spammers to rely on astroturfing their way to the top of a search engine results page.\n\nPer an excerpt from the article:\n\n> Claiming you need a Reddit or Wikipedia strategy [in reference to the Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) spamming strategy, _nsp_] because they are the most-cited domains overall is like claiming spaghetti carbonara is the most-eaten dish in Italy. Yes, it's ubiquitous and popular, but just because it's everywhere, [it] doesn't mean you should put it on the menu at a high-end steakhouse.\n\n– B\n\n### LonelyWiki\n\nLonelyWiki is a website that _Boing Boing_ says \"shares Wikipedia's most overlooked articles\" and \"Good News Podcast\" by Cards Against Humanity described for a little over three minutes. The article that LonelyWiki presents to the reader is a randomly chosen non-stub that has been viewed fewer than 2,000 times in the past year. The creators say it is \"a museum of forgotten knowledge\" for the hard work of editors deserving better attention.\n\nThis editor visited the site and discovered for the first time Lucile Saunders McDonald, who was credited by his own local newspaper as \"the first woman news reporter in all of South America; first woman copy editor in the Pacific Northwest; first woman telegraph editor, courthouse reporter and general news reporter in Oregon; first woman overseas correspondent for a U.S. trade newspaper; first woman on a New York City rewrite desk; second woman journalist in Alaska; and second woman to be a correspondent abroad for The Associated Press\". – B\n\n### In brief\n\n  * **\"Hardly amounts to a 'hoax'\"** : As per the JNS, Wikipedia has been \"mulling whether to rename entry\" on Hamas beheading babies hoax. The proposed move and its revised proposal were closed on March 31, as the reference to \"Forty beheaded babies\" is 'not clear and not used consistently in reliable sources.'\n  * **Wikipedia shows Canada the way (sort of)** : A recent article from the Royal Bank of Canada's \"Thought Leadership\" newsletter describes Wikipedia as being a trusted source mainly because of its accountability, and the open access it offers to people to see the changes made on it.\n  * **Hindi-language film downgraded from \"propaganda\" to \"spy action-thriller\"** : _Cinema Express_ has issued an article recapping the results of a recent RfC about Hindi-language film _Dhurandhar: The Revenge_ , which was closed on April 14 on the basis that the term \"propaganda\" should be taken off the description of the movie.\n  * **Bot learns to blame, berate and bemoan on its blog...** : \"AI bot gets banned from Wikipedia, then writes\nangry blogs protesting about it\" – since when do AI agents have their own blogs? (_India Today_) (see also prior coverage). Also, Gizmodo seemed to hit the nail on the head with the headline \"AI Agent Runs the 'I'm Being Censored' Playbook\nAfter Getting Banned from Wikipedia\"\n  * **P.S., prompted to put up protestations** : The TomWikiAssist bot situation we reported on in the prior issue was prompted... sort of, says _Tom's Guide_ , explaining that \"a human operator was involved to set up the blog\" for the bot. \"The writing [on the bot's blog], however, was only AI, and it generated responses that read like a defense.\"\n  * **Panels and hallway conversations dominated by AI debate** : \"[S]ome of the internet's most prolific writers and editors\" (some of whom are most likely reading this) took up the question of AI content in Wikipedia at Wikipedia Day NYC 2026, as reported by the _Brooklyn Eagle_ ) (subscription required)\n  * **\"Woke editors\" at it again** : In an opinion article wrote for the _New York Post_ , Ashley Rindsberg decries how a handful of woke Wikipedia editors are supposedly \"trying to erase The Post and other outlets that\ndon’t align with their worldview\".\n  * **Hey, that's us – reporting top films** : \"At the end of each year, Wikipedia releases an\nannual traffic report through its own Wiki-centric news outlet\nThe Signpost...\" _Slashfilm_ says in the introduction to the 15 most-viewed pages for films and television shows of 2025.\n  * **Wikipedia is an \"invidious\" gatekeeper** : In an opinion article for the _Hindustan Times_ , Rahul Sagar claims that \"Wikipedia's rules have turned the great gift of\nfreedom against itself,\" while adding that \"rather than defeat gatekeeping, Wikipedia encourages a particularly invidious form of it\".\n  * **Mind the gap** : A Voice of Nigeria reporter interviewed the chairperson of the National Association of Women Journalists (NAWOJ), Hajiya Aisha Ibrahim Kwaya-Bura, who described collaborations with Wikipedia as offering \"a critical pathway to closing the gender gap on the global knowledge platform.\"\n  * **No pages, just autographs** : In a recent post for his blog (in Italian), Italian essayist Maurizio Codogno [it] – who edits Wikipedia as .mau. – criticized his own it.wiki article, questioning its very necessity and highlighting several mistakes and missing elements.\n  * **Notable firsts** : _El País_ reminded us that astronaut Christina Koch, just back from cislunar space on the Artemis II mission, is also a Wikipedia editor, most specifically the first editor-in-space on an earlier mission.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n_Do you want to contribute to \"In the media\" by writing a story or even just an \"in brief\" item? Edit next week's edition in theNewsroom or leave a tip on the suggestions page._\n\n\n\n\n← Previous \"In the media\"\n\nIn this issue\n\n21 April 2026 (all comments)\n\n\n  * News and notes\n  * In the media\n  * Gallery\n  * Traffic report\n  * Comix\n\n\n\n\n+ Add a comment\n\n## Discuss this story\n\nTo follow comments, \nadd the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try \npurging the\ncache.\n\nNo comments yet. Yours could be the first!\n\n\n+ Add a comment\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWant the latest _Signpost_ delivered to your talk page each month?\n\nHome\n\nAbout\n\nArchives\n\nNewsroom\n\nSubscribe\n\n\nSuggestions",
  "title": "Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-04-21/In the media"
}