{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihr6zgal6wupgpsaogh746tgqrtuurena7girvv3swr3qmx3cve54",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:jo3wjj2gx46alocis4wubmwr/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgu2dzzails2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreihorshem3yqx6q52qq3wmhshrawideilnmuptzzsyynzqlsyqlbue"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 73311
  },
  "path": "/2026/03/what-is-good-for-goose-is-good-for.html",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-12T06:44:59.000Z",
  "site": "https://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com",
  "textContent": " \n\nThe English Wikipedia banned a source used to prove the veracity of statements made in articles. That is in itself not a problem, the problem is that it had been a source that provided proof that could not be substantiated in any other way.\n\n\nThe problem was with a feud with parties outside of the own organisation.They were threatened, abused.What clinched the argument for the ban was that they changed the narrative by altering the content they provided.\n\n\n\n\nThe organisation banned was not the Trump government of the United States of America.\n\nThanks,\n\nGerardM",
  "title": "What is good for the goose is good for the gander"
}