{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreib3ymkxx2b7vn4zkt5zy2czbcr7rt2yigpeuz7o75mg2wmvweb22y",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ixd3llanirxy6by2epvxdu7k/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmw4xe64kqh2"
  },
  "description": "Hi @thisismissem, apologies if this has been asked previously.\n\nI noticed upon looking at the IFTAS blocklists that `#severity` is either `silence` or `suspend`. My feeling is that this aligns with Mastodon's usages, since they adopted the format Mastodon uses for shared blocklists.\n\nHas the T&S TF put together a recommended list of levels for federation policies, and if so, do they align with what FIRES would also publish?[...]",
  "path": "/post/1958",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-28T13:30:10.767Z",
  "site": "https://activitypub.space",
  "tags": [
    "@thisismissem@activitypub.space",
    "This doc article"
  ],
  "textContent": "Hi @thisismissem, apologies if this has been asked previously.\n\nI noticed upon looking at the IFTAS blocklists that `#severity` is either `silence` or `suspend`. My feeling is that this aligns with Mastodon's usages, since they adopted the format Mastodon uses for shared blocklists.\n\nHas the T&S TF put together a recommended list of levels for federation policies, and if so, do they align with what FIRES would also publish?[...]\n\nThis doc article notes that the levels are Reject media, limit, suspend, and blocklist, with \"silence\" being the former name of \"limit\".\n\nRight now NodeBB does a binary \"if you're on the list everything is blocked\" approach, but I'm looking to add some granularity.\n\nThanks!",
  "title": "Federation Policies and limit/suspend/etc.?"
}