{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihwbu5nt7jgx2tsijduhdfot6a5jyrqq26tdkdv7ye2sk4kayjw7e",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpjdfttx4ju2"
  },
  "path": "/t/language-vision-regarding-safety-guarantees/24418?page=2#post_21",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-30T14:27:58.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "robofinch:\n\n> But I see one point of using Rust as _precisely_ that ability to allow \"this code may contain bugs\" without causing arbitrarily large damage.\n\nRust protects you from bugs, but I don't envision anybody wanting to deliberately advertise that their code may be buggy and users have to protect themselves from such bugs. That would just seem like a rubbish library.",
  "title": "Language vision regarding safety guarantees"
}