{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiccvavuce7kmazwo5onu7ibijf3igrz7n5q5wwfngqdf5b3he5zoq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnuq4uat5pu2"
  },
  "path": "/t/race-semantic-linker-approach-to-stable-cross-crate-abi-without-runtime-overhead/24369#post_7",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-09T15:35:13.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "You're right that this is high-level. The post was intentionally framed as a concept exploration rather than an implementation proposal - the goal was to get exactly this kind of feedback on where the hard parts actually are. The linker question and the polymorphisation history are gaps I wasn't aware of. Would you say the BTF/CO-RE direction is more tractable than the Swift Witness Tables approach for Rust's use cases?",
  "title": "RACE: Semantic-linker approach to stable cross-crate ABI without runtime overhead"
}