{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifzm2mevmwzlevsvrddg6gam23jbgsjfxkekjvwe4nhhdlk4ivgru",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mn4dl46nxmy2"
  },
  "path": "/t/parser-error-recovery-in-syn-for-better-ide-support-with-proc-macros/24362#post_1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-30T20:16:40.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "tags": [
    "Crowdsourcing request: What syntax changes that will affect the AST are currently in flight?",
    "@ekuber"
  ],
  "textContent": "Crowdsourcing request: What syntax changes that will affect the AST are currently in flight?\n\n> one other thing that would be really nice would to have better parser error recovery so using a proc-macro on some large section of code doesn't just replace everything with `compile_error!()` whenever the code is incomplete while you're editing it in an IDE.\n\nCrowdsourcing request: What syntax changes that will affect the AST are currently in flight?\n\n> Lets open another thread for that conversation. I'd like to hear more.\n\n@ekuber\n\nCreating a new thread here as you requested.",
  "title": "Parser error recovery in `syn` for better IDE support with proc-macros"
}