{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreib6pr3o7vnxura4nryg53ovy37gxuaqxe7ylmixw3a5ldia67jyka",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm2quojucpt2"
  },
  "path": "/t/pre-rfc-improved-ergonomics-for/24336#post_7",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-17T14:33:03.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "MusicalNinjaDad:\n\n> zackw:\n>\n>> I'm pretty sure you _meant_ to have a section explaining this, since the \"this won't work because ...\" section is responding to critics of your proposal; did you accidentally cut it when editing?\n>\n> Didn't cut as much as decided to focus first on assessing the overall wider desirability of such a feature.\n\nSee, the problem is, in the proposal as-is you give several examples of code that doesn't work right now, but you don't talk _at all_ about what you want to have happen instead.\n\nAnd that means I have _no idea_ what \"feature\" you have in mind, so I have no way to assess whether it might be desirable or not?",
  "title": "Pre-RFC improved ergonomics for `!`"
}