{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiec3deqmz7vnevnsvm7u5s24hzrcibmegaunrzoj3ey7xb74c7bmy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkibri2ydwr2"
  },
  "path": "/t/pre-rfc-cargo-package-should-include-fewer-files-by-default/24188?page=2#post_38",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-27T13:43:12.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "SwishSwushPow:\n\n> Do you think my post is going in the direction of analyzing overlaps in use case and design or would you wish for something else in that regard? I don't claim to have covered every detail, but in my opinion, it should at least be a good start to compare both issues.\n\nThere are two parts here\n\n  1. I called it a short term solution and you said it wasn't but I'm not really seeing a justification as to why. Re-iterating the structure of your post does not help.\n  2. Your responses tend to be very verbose and take a while to replying to the core concern raised by the other person, to the point I've been wondering how much is being written by an AI and whether it is worth engaging. If using an AI, please don't. If this is yourself, then keep in mind that in technical writing, there is the concept of an Inverted Pyramid in structure where you make your core point in response and then slowly expand from there so people can't miss your point and can get as much detail as they need.\n\n",
  "title": "[Pre-RFC] `cargo package` should include fewer files by default"
}