{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidc2nx4yqtnsb46lxhh3u64zvjxkfhbmdrcjtr5irdkywrxezu3sq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkgzj75rm6h2"
  },
  "path": "/t/pre-rfc-dns-domains-as-package-namespaces/24202#post_15",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-27T01:59:22.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "Scenario, in order:\n\n  1. User A registers domain X.\n  2. User A publishes a crate under the X namespace.\n  3. Domain X lapses.\n  4. User B registers domain X.\n  5. User B publishes a different crate under the X namespace.\n\n\n\nMy understanding of your proposal is that this would be permitted? imo this is a serious issue, as two things would be shown as connected despite having no common ownership.",
  "title": "[Pre-RFC] DNS domains as package namespaces"
}