{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibrfkw5bxmlwa2g2v2btslkhzkpc7prvqi3zxz7iq2xgfwwq3pvjq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mj5kyrph4tb2"
  },
  "path": "/t/pre-rfc-btf-relocations/24161#post_9",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-10T12:28:14.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "As a more general comment, I do think the sized hierarchy work is the right way to approach this issue. Perhaps one could expose some entirely different way to access btf data? For example, a macro that takes a struct name and field name and returns the offset. The program can then use that value on a raw pointer explicitly.",
  "title": "[Pre-RFC] BTF relocations"
}