{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicxxnoi3cdoqupkn4jry3e5lcpofvjl4rrsrnjkrbbkseyratkijq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3miv7mmpwr2x2"
  },
  "path": "/t/pre-rfc-bulk-visibility-syntax/24136#post_4",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-06T18:36:53.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "tags": [
    "https://lang-team.rust-lang.org/frequently-requested-changes.html#fundamental-changes-to-rust-syntax"
  ],
  "textContent": "I think this generally falls under the \"alternative syntaxes\" part of https://lang-team.rust-lang.org/frequently-requested-changes.html#fundamental-changes-to-rust-syntax.\n\nWould this be _terrible_? No. But that's not the question. The big question is whether having two ways to do it is worse overall than just writing out `pub` a few more times. And to me, it's obvious that the answer is \"no\" there too. If you don't like typing it, use an IDE to add it to a bunch of stuff.\n\nBut I don't want to make people have a coding standards conversation about which they should use in a codebase. I don't want to have to discuss which one `rustfmt` should use. Etc.",
  "title": "[Pre-RFC] Bulk visibility syntax"
}