{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifyhnya2eucfajghhhtxviacefwbr3mtaltjfp7sydbctt2idcteq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mijarhts2xw2"
  },
  "path": "/t/stable-type-identifiers-a-missing-piece-for-crabi-and-export/24093?page=2#post_31",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-02T12:50:24.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "The idea has evolved over the course of this thread. The initial post mentioned dynamic linkage as the motivation, but in post #14 I explicitly distinguished between two separate issues: identifiers linked to ABI compatibility, which is what #3435 addresses, and stable type identification independent of the ABI. My question since post #14 specifically concerns the second case. Is there any prior work on this?",
  "title": "Stable type identifiers: a missing piece for crABI and export"
}