{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiesbkgnwyn4m57b2emvm3ijzjwoanodhndugr4qxfknk33m4ft7wi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mh5ucanarop2"
  },
  "path": "/t/just-mut-alongside-let-mut/24084#post_1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-15T13:46:07.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "Hi,\n\nI suggest/recommend support for just the `mut` keyword for mutable variables alongside existing `let mut`\n\nIf we cannot accommodate `mut`, can we think of a new 3-character keyword that rhymes with `let` - from soundex or other criteria?\n\nSome suggestions ...\n\ntel - the reverse of let\n\ncut\n\nset - highly recommended for clarity - (clean, clear, crisp) !\n\nNaga Vijayapuram",
  "title": "Just `mut` alongside `let mut`"
}