{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibq4rjqcihduymtszq7qqkv4x2gpqwvfiwyafd2taungm2uy3cb2m",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgzalfqwl232"
  },
  "path": "/t/optional-features-are-part-of-the-crate-the-project-should-say-so/24069?page=2#post_23",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-13T21:32:37.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "tags": [
    "Tracking Issue: Support project-specific config in manifest · Issue #12738 · rust-lang/cargo · GitHub"
  ],
  "textContent": "We will likely never directly support `.cargo/config.toml` fields in `Cargo.toml`. Instead, we will need to look at how they should be abstracted in `Cargo.toml`. This is being tracked in Tracking Issue: Support project-specific config in manifest · Issue #12738 · rust-lang/cargo · GitHub.",
  "title": "Optional features are part of the crate — the project should say so"
}