{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihqkghtjj5dg53krut7i4kuuj5ymx4dwbbwfbmlcpex5l33mbyj3u",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfsh5523gib2"
  },
  "path": "/t/pre-pre-rfc-splatting-for-named-arguments-and-function-overloading/24012?page=2#post_40",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-26T13:29:24.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "Nadrieril:\n\n> C++ FFI is my main motivation for having any kind of overloading. I don't particularly want overloading in the language outside of that, it just so happened that there was a tiny-looking syntactic feature that would give it \"for free\".\n\nWouldn't an `#[attribute]` do better here than trying to give extra meaning to other Rust code especially on the \"[not wanting] overloading in the language outside of that\" front? (Assuming C++-calling-Rust FFI direction.)",
  "title": "[Pre-pre-RFC] \"splatting\" for named arguments and function overloading"
}