{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibwkwuxx6khcyeueqrsvnguxljxj7kggou62bwj5icm4cbmip36ky",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3merjqxreoav2"
  },
  "path": "/t/what-prevents-cargo-from-adding-bench-bin-example-dependencies/24004#post_8",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-13T21:12:53.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "tags": [
    "enable-features",
    "rejected",
    "discussion"
  ],
  "textContent": "To put some of my comments in a different way, if someone where to try to move this forward, I would recommend looking at the larger landscape of potential dependencies tables and work on a clear picture of why this is the route to go along with a high level design, including\n\n  * comparing with designs as wide as enable-features (including looking at why it was rejected and related discussion)\n  * Registry index\n  * `cargo add` / `cargo remove`\n  * Interaction of existing and new tables\n\n",
  "title": "What prevents Cargo from adding `[bench/bin/example-dependencies]`?"
}