{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig3pmgtzwd5fmcemistanyc6jy2bnn7mzk3osife4nvt5twcog5si",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ivbknywyskln22er3nkssdhl/app.bsky.feed.post/3me5bdnqqy6a2"
  },
  "path": "/t/private-unsafe-fields-are-a-poorly-motivated-feature/23976#post_11",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-05T20:48:54.000Z",
  "site": "https://internals.rust-lang.org",
  "textContent": "scottmcm:\n\n> The point of the RFC, as I see it, is to solve the `Vec::set_len` problem.\n\nIf that’s indeed the primary motivation, I’m wondering why the RCF turned out choosing the “all access is `unsafe`” option over allowing reads.",
  "title": "Private unsafe fields are a poorly motivated feature"
}