{
"$type": "site.standard.document",
"bskyPostRef": {
"cid": "bafyreifubahdx2byxr32epfhx2jpn53rfc2x2drq2ocvjfxk66rfayfhru",
"uri": "at://did:plc:iva3tusnsf4saw2fw6dbangh/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgtgwf5m6jc2"
},
"coverImage": {
"$type": "blob",
"ref": {
"$link": "bafkreig3ou33hinbzmfi7mjzlfdb6twcamwzhst33y2lmr5lhjs6wkwpza"
},
"mimeType": "image/jpeg",
"size": 39677
},
"path": "/valve-does-not-cooperate-with-gambling-sites-counter-strike-publishers-issue-rare-public-defence-of-lootbox-mechanics-following-new-york-lawsuit",
"publishedAt": "2026-03-11T20:15:58.000Z",
"site": "https://www.rockpapershotgun.com",
"tags": [
"Xbox 360",
"Single Player",
"Multiplayer Cooperative",
"Strategy",
"Bird view / Isometric",
"MOBA",
"Electronic Arts",
"Counter-Strike 2",
"Team Fortress 2",
"Valve Corporation",
"Gambling",
"Shooter",
"loot boxes",
"Valve Software",
"Multiplayer Competitive",
"Steam",
"First person",
"PC",
"Dota 2",
"eSports relevant",
"PS3",
"Third person",
"Mac",
"Valve",
"Military",
"\"letting children and adults alike illegally gamble\"",
"here",
"Read more"
],
"textContent": "In an unusual show of candour, Valve have spoken out publicly against a lawsuit filed in New York, USA that accuses them of \"letting children and adults alike illegally gamble\" via loot boxes in Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team Fortress 2.\n\nWith the caveat that I am no Atticus Finch-esque legal expert or even a Louis Tully-grade bumbler, I find Valve's rebuttal to be a mixture of whataboutery and tactical mitigation, with a couple of fair points. It basically sidesteps what I think is the lawsuit's most important argument – that lootbox mechanics are fundamentally manipulative. You can read the thing in full here, or you can read my slapdash summary-with-notes, below.\n\nRead more",
"title": "\"Valve does not cooperate with gambling sites\" - Counter-Strike publishers issue rare public defence of lootbox mechanics, following New York lawsuit"
}