{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifllqtlbtvu4cgqcnds6wxw6lq7l7ikxjuweoerdvtrnpuqsawm3i",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:itdwwrxvp5plq2i6rsanlqio/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkj4cja7fo22"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibe6e7lvkfupgwurljy3ij5wrkd37c3rvfrfaa5tnrmlgezxh3uoq"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 95456
  },
  "path": "/politics/487078/supreme-court-us-chatrie-geofence-warrant-cellphone",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-27T19:30:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.vox.com",
  "tags": [
    "Criminal Justice",
    "Policy",
    "Politics",
    "Supreme Court"
  ],
  "textContent": "If I’d only listened to the first half of the Supreme Court’s Monday argument in Chatrie v. United States, a case asking when police can use cellphone data to determine who was present near the site of a crime, I would be convinced that the Court is about to drastically limit Americans’ right to privacy. […]",
  "title": "The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-27T19:59:53.000Z"
}