{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibo6i2lg3eodli2sn57pcoitehr7zabycrgko47lofnetym2wjjiu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:itdwwrxvp5plq2i6rsanlqio/app.bsky.feed.post/3mes657wdpb72"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibuej5dj64ujlifazfwq6gofuoi4f2zlcof54jyyc2ylrwvytlo3y"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 95695
  },
  "path": "/future-perfect/479043/nih-ohsu-primate-research-center-sanctuary",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-13T13:30:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.vox.com",
  "tags": [
    "Animal Welfare",
    "Future Perfect",
    "Neuroscience",
    "Policy",
    "Politics",
    "Science"
  ],
  "textContent": "The Trump administration’s scientific agenda has been widely characterized — rightly so — as a war on scientific progress. But, hear me out here: There is more to the story. This administration’s science policy is being shaped not solely by anti-science ideologues, but also by a motley coalition of players who have distinct criticisms of […]",
  "title": "One good thing the Trump administration might actually do for science",
  "updatedAt": "2026-02-13T18:51:21.000Z"
}