{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "content": {
    "$type": "pub.leaflet.content",
    "pages": [
      {
        "$type": "pub.leaflet.pages.linearDocument",
        "blocks": [
          {
            "block": {
              "$type": "pub.leaflet.blocks.website",
              "description": "Today's links Criticizing the everything machine: It slices, it dices, it even makes paperclips! Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. Object permanence: Parliament v DRM; Colbert's commencement; Counterfeiting x luxury goods; Joule thief; Lean-back media. Upcoming appearances: Kansas City, LA, Menlo Park, Toronto, NYC, Edinburgh, South Bend. Recent appearances: Where I've been. Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em. Colophon: All the rest. Criticizing the everything machine (permalink) \"Gish Gallop\" is the debating term for an opponent who makes so many claims that \"it's impossible to address them in the time available\" (it's named for Creationist Duane Gish, who was notorious for this tactic): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop I think about the Gish Gallop whenever I'm asked to comment on AI. Here's a recent example: last week, I had a pre-interview call with a radio producer who wanted me to come on a 13-minute segment to discusses \"whether there's a problem with AI governance?\" I asked what the show meant by that: was it whether regulation of AI in commercial or public sector decision-making needed more oversight? Was it that the siting and provisioning of data-centers needed more democratic accountability? Was it that workers deserved more of a say in AI's impact on labor markets? Was it that customers and/or audiences should be able to opt out of AI customer service and AI slop? Was it ab…",
              "title": "Pluralistic: Criticizing the everything machine (06 Jun 2026)",
              "url": "https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/06/applied-counterescatology/"
            }
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "createdAt": "2026-06-06T18:51:51.582Z",
  "description": "Today's links Criticizing the everything machine: It slices, it dices, it even makes paperclips! Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. Object permanence: Parliament v DRM; Colbert's commencement; Counterfeiting x luxury goods; Joule thief; Lean-back media. Upcoming appearances: Kansas City, LA, Menlo Park, Toronto, NYC, Edinburgh, South Bend. Recent appearances: Where I've been. Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em. Colophon: All the rest. Criticizing the everything machine (permalink) \"Gish Gallop\" is the debating term for an opponent who makes so many claims that \"it's impossible to address them in the time available\" (it's named for Creationist Duane Gish, who was notorious for this tactic): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop I think about the Gish Gallop whenever I'm asked to comment on AI. Here's a recent example: last week, I had a pre-interview call with a radio producer who wanted me to come on a 13-minute segment to discusses \"whether there's a problem with AI governance?\" I asked what the show meant by that: was it whether regulation of AI in commercial or public sector decision-making needed more oversight? Was it that the siting and provisioning of data-centers needed more democratic accountability? Was it that workers deserved more of a say in AI's impact on labor markets? Was it that customers and/or audiences should be able to opt out of AI customer service and AI slop? Was it ab…",
  "links": [
    {
      "rel": "related",
      "uri": "https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/06/applied-counterescatology/"
    }
  ],
  "path": "/mq2pm8l6amdo41hunu",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-06T18:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "at://did:plc:ijszkrwgabtihk7td653q6gb/site.standard.publication/skyreader-links",
  "textContent": "Today's links Criticizing the everything machine: It slices, it dices, it even makes paperclips! Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. Object permanence: Parliament v DRM; Colbert's commencement; Counterfeiting x luxury goods; Joule thief; Lean-back media. Upcoming appearances: Kansas City, LA, Menlo Park, Toronto, NYC, Edinburgh, South Bend. Recent appearances: Where I've been. Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em. Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em. Colophon: All the rest. Criticizing the everything machine (permalink) \"Gish Gallop\" is the debating term for an opponent who makes so many claims that \"it's impossible to address them in the time available\" (it's named for Creationist Duane Gish, who was notorious for this tactic): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop I think about the Gish Gallop whenever I'm asked to comment on AI. Here's a recent example: last week, I had a pre-interview call with a radio producer who wanted me to come on a 13-minute segment to discusses \"whether there's a problem with AI governance?\" I asked what the show meant by that: was it whether regulation of AI in commercial or public sector decision-making needed more oversight? Was it that the siting and provisioning of data-centers needed more democratic accountability? Was it that workers deserved more of a say in AI's impact on labor markets? Was it that customers and/or audiences should be able to opt out of AI customer service and AI slop? Was it ab…",
  "title": "Pluralistic: Criticizing the everything machine (06 Jun 2026)"
}