{
"path": "/now/keystroke-dynamics-rabbit-hole",
"site": "at://did:plc:ia2zdnhjaokf5lazhxrmj6eu/site.standard.publication/3mbykzswhqc2x",
"$type": "site.standard.document",
"title": "Keystroke Dynamics: My New Rabbit Hole",
"content": {
"$type": "site.standard.content.markdown",
"markdown": "Did a dangerous thing today and started thinking too much. Now I have an idea that I can't get out of my head.\n\nMy friend [@iammatthias](https://iammatthias.com/) shared [theamdash.com](https://www.theamdash.com/) with me today, and while it came out last year, this was my first time seeing it. It's been hard to tell if the idea behind `am-` was a joke, an artistic expression, an attempt at a solution to a real problem, or perhaps all of the above. Regardless, it got me thinking about what a real solution to determining AI vs Human created content in a digital world. \n\nA lot of the initial ideas that came to mind just weren't good enough. There's so much AI can do to imitate what a person creates, and we've all experienced it. Then I started to think less about the end product, and more about the process. AI will spit something out in a few seconds, while human writing takes much more time and thought. That's when my sites turned to Keystroke Dynamics. \n\nWhen a person writes, there are natural pauses, breaks, or rhythms on the keyboard. These patterns actually become a source of identification, or in the field of keystroke dynamics, authentication. What if this was applied to provenance? What if there was a standard + essential libraries that make it possible to prove someone's identity through their content on any platform? \n\nDown the rabbit hole we go"
},
"coverImage": {
"$type": "blob",
"ref": {
"$link": "bafkreibuxyp2gth3igqik7fxu4cm4nducetgp67hhlx36bwahgnuw4xmoa"
},
"mimeType": "image/png",
"size": 2522
},
"publishedAt": "2026-03-11T00:15:28.707Z",
"textContent": "Did a dangerous thing today and started thinking too much. Now I have an idea that I can't get out of my head.\n\nMy friend @iammatthias shared theamdash.com with me today, and while it came out last year, this was my first time seeing it. It's been hard to tell if the idea behind am- was a joke, an artistic expression, an attempt at a solution to a real problem, or perhaps all of the above. Regardless, it got me thinking about what a real solution to determining AI vs Human created content in a digital world. \n\nA lot of the initial ideas that came to mind just weren't good enough. There's so much AI can do to imitate what a person creates, and we've all experienced it. Then I started to think less about the end product, and more about the process. AI will spit something out in a few seconds, while human writing takes much more time and thought. That's when my sites turned to Keystroke Dynamics. \n\nWhen a person writes, there are natural pauses, breaks, or rhythms on the keyboard. These patterns actually become a source of identification, or in the field of keystroke dynamics, authentication. What if this was applied to provenance? What if there was a standard + essential libraries that make it possible to prove someone's identity through their content on any platform? \n\nDown the rabbit hole we go"
}