{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifkcvkcfnhvudgeapgwymxweo6sh43xylvzu23hbguxpqanlh2oo4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:i7budt2wflrcfy6jtvfocbix/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkkwvuccd4g2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?p=1278939#p1278939",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-28T12:07:06.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.tt-forums.net",
  "tags": [
    "U&ReRMM",
    "Standardized Railtype Scheme",
    "althonos"
  ],
  "textContent": "> if you'd like to play with the updated grf\n\nDon't worry, I built the GRF from source from the GitHub repo\n\n\n> Ref the rail types\n\nThe problem here lies with the rail type table, not with the documentation. Currently you have this (summarized):\n\nCode:\n\n\n    STANDARD_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_OHLE : [\"SAAE\", \"ELRL\", \"RAIL\"],STANDARD_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_25KV : [\"SAAA\", \"ELRL\", \"RAIL\"],STANDARD_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_15KV : [\"SAAa\", \"SAAA\", \"ELRL\", \"RAIL\"]STANDARD_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_NONE : [\"SAAN\", \"RAIL\"],NARROW_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_OHLE : [\"NAAE\", \"ELRL\", \"RAIL\"],NARROW_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_25KV : [\"NAAA\", \"ELRL\", \"RAIL\"],NARROW_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_15KV : [\"NAAa\", \"NAAA\", \"ELRL\", \"RAIL\"],NARROW_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_NONE : [\"NAAN\", \"RAIL\"],\n\nIn the case the user plays with a \"simple\" track set which does not have various electrification diversity, there won't be a \"SAAA\" or \"SAAa\" rail type. In that case, the standard gauge \"correctly\" falls back to \"ELRL\", and only electrified engines are available on the basic \"ELRL\" electrified rail type. However, for the narrow gauge, you don't provide \"NAAE\" as a fall-back for the other electrified rail type. That means that if you have a \"simple\" narrow-gauge set (which provides only \"NAAN\" and \"NAAE\"), the NARROW_GAUGE_RAILTYPE_25KV will incorrectly fall back to \"ELRL\" instead of \"NAAE\". For all narrow-gauge types, \"NAAE\" should be the fall-back with higher priority, and only then fall-back to ELRL if there is no narrow-gauge track available. You can see for instance how U&ReRMM uses the rail type labels, or the Standardized Railtype Scheme. Similarly, \"SAAA\" and \"SAAa\" should fall back to \"SAAE\" before \"ELRL\".\n\nRe wagon/coaches, I can make PRs with the things that would make sense to add, but I'm also still working on adding more wagons so perhaps I'll wait until I have a complete set. I have some e.g. modern EMUs that could be added already though.\n\nStatistics: Posted by althonos — 28 Apr 2026 12:07\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Graphics Development • Re: [OTTD] 2cc TrainsInNML",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-28T12:07:06.000Z"
}