{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreia4aertngkyyrkisn5nc3lpj5rghv2i3jsvztjnjylaux6eyau7u4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:i7budt2wflrcfy6jtvfocbix/app.bsky.feed.post/3mg2wuxdy55r2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?p=1278345#p1278345",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-01T22:01:35.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.tt-forums.net",
  "tags": [
    "CET",
    "ebla71"
  ],
  "textContent": "> Until CET came along, these sets were a good substitute. They aren't anymore.\n\nTotally agree - CET is still the best match I could find.\n\nThe only thing I don't really like - but this is possibly more a matter of the general town placement algorithm and not the CET town NewGRF itself - is that the towns all look \"round\" while often they are more irregular in shape, stretching in a valley or along a river or a coastline. Guess this has to be still manually corrected for the most visible cases.\n\nStatistics: Posted by ebla71 — 01 Mar 2026 22:01\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Scenarios and Saved Games • Re: ebla's incomplete projects",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-01T22:01:35.000Z"
}