{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiaqhntoglb3jtuheprfvll32kvi6sf7vow3d23eovhnuk74gu4nly",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:i243uudlyj6njfil6ddywa7k/app.bsky.feed.post/3ml5klwfmgw62"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiawtslbxwlmo5sgw6zmw3km4wfbnaqgq77lk5lgh2du6kkrqzf2ia"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 58415
  },
  "path": "/2026/05/05/why-the-its-not-x-its-y-ai-tic-backfires-on-its-writers.html",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-05T20:44:47.000Z",
  "site": "https://boingboing.net",
  "tags": [
    "Post",
    "AI",
    "language",
    "linkedin",
    "psychology",
    "Technology",
    "writing",
    "The Conversation",
    "Read the rest",
    "Why the \"It's not X, it's Y\" AI tic backfires on its writers",
    "Boing Boing"
  ],
  "textContent": "Try to keep the idea of a white bear out of your head.\n\nDaniel Wegner's 1987 experiment is now showing up in a critique of one of the most recognizable AI writing tics, the LinkedIn-saturated \"It's not X, it's Y,\" by University of Guelph linguistics scholar Joshua Gonzales, writing for The Conversation. — Read the rest \n\nThe post Why the \"It's not X, it's Y\" AI tic backfires on its writers appeared first on Boing Boing.",
  "title": "Why the \"It's not X, it's Y\" AI tic backfires on its writers"
}