{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreic6iqmarfq3k6ohwk34oqg7tm3efwio66wg2cdakrns2rsjgijikm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:i243uudlyj6njfil6ddywa7k/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgbv2t3xm7u2"
  },
  "path": "/2026/03/04/legaleagle-unpacks-the-bizarre-legal-theory-behind-nationalizing-u-s-elections.html",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-04T21:45:05.000Z",
  "site": "https://boingboing.net",
  "tags": [
    "Post",
    "Jumping thru hoops",
    "Read the rest",
    "LegalEagle unpacks the bizarre legal theory behind \"nationalizing\" U.S. elections",
    "Boing Boing"
  ],
  "textContent": "[](https://boingboing.net/2026/03/04/legaleagle-unpacks-the-bizarre-legal-theory-behind-nationalizing-u-s-elections.html \"LegalEagle unpacks the bizarre legal theory behind \"nationalizing\" U.S. elections\")\n\nLegalEagle takes a close look at a controversial Trumpworld legal theory about \"nationalizing\" U.S. elections and explains why the Constitution makes that pretty darn ridiculous.\n\nElections are not run by the Federal government; it abides by them. The Orange Menace being afraid his disastrous policies will land him in hot water is no reason for that to change. — Read the rest \n\nThe post LegalEagle unpacks the bizarre legal theory behind \"nationalizing\" U.S. elections appeared first on Boing Boing.",
  "title": "LegalEagle unpacks the bizarre legal theory behind \"nationalizing\" U.S. elections"
}