{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieqldw4hazkqmd7hp3chbgwzfwowzhejcyfpkzwriwdb5kljkh2r4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mp2k5lyeou42"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33524&p=275933#p275933",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-24T18:12:00.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> I feel almost like we were baited into responding and now will be punished. We probably should have just not talked about it...\n\nIt's nonsense. Not talking about it would have it justifiably deleted for not having any active interest in it warranting removal or merging.\nConveniently, the person starting this and now complaining that it's been discussed here ignored the work people put into looking up references and posting them here to improve the article, as well! And it's not like I asked people to go vote -- I just asked people to improve the references if they could. So there was no \"direct appeal to make sure the article is kept\"; that's twisting the narrative.\n\nConversely, if the attitude is that a browser engine doesn't deserve an article of its own if only used in one main application, then the Gecko article should be deleted also, since Gecko is purely a Firefox thing now (since Mozilla clearly distanced itself from SeaMonkey and Thunderbird in their development).\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Goanna article in EN Wikipedia has been nominated for deletion",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-24T18:12:00.000Z"
}