Add-ons • Re: Consider updating the Greasemonkey listings on PM and Basilisk add-on pages

they can still easily find it with a web search for 'github greasemonkey for pale moon'.

Even easier, they could just access the fork from my GitHub page, since my project was built on top of it.

But according to the website's team page, the add-ons team members are moonbat and FranklinDM and they're the ones who worked on adding my extension as an external link in the addons site of Pale Moon. When I saw that they put my extension right below the old fork instead of replacing it, I didn't question that decision (partly because I was still working on many corners of the extension, including the compatibility side and changing the entire extension architecture).

The main issue I have with the old fork being present is that some users here would write a userscript that would be compatible with the old fork, but not 100% compatible with the new fork, making people feel divided here and adding more inconvenience on the end-user.

But we can wait for other people's feedback on this post, be it some other users to weigh in their opinion or Pale Moon's addons team weighing in as well.