Add-ons • Re: Working on a Greasemonkey fork for Pale Moon

Off-topic:

It has been bothering me a bit on why do some users still use the old fork of Greasemonkey that not only is not functioning on many mainstream APIs, but also has a lot of vulnerabilities in it. Is it that they haven't heard of the new fork? Is it that they believe the new fork is in active development, so they assume they'll be facing a lot of bugs? Is it that they're skeptical about mine somehow introducing more vulnerabilities? I guess I'll never be able to satisfy everyone

I've been using the old one because my scripts work with it, and yours was in the middle of being developed. I've also not looked into how much of a hassle it would be to migrate.