{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidv5d5ujald2doshltwbgny64khfkkknmr5cyn25gu73xspaz27zm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mncu5y6yso32"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33466&p=275100#p275100",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-02T14:28:08.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Furthermore, a European stance might appear somewhat strange to the average non-English-speaking user for another reason.\n> The language barrier was mentioned in this thread. And I think that would be a valid objection — one where Pale Moon falls somewhat behind other presentations. The websites of common browsers are multilingual. Not that I would particularly miss it. Possibly negligible — given all the translation features and AI integrations nowadays.\n\nI don't see what a multilingual website has to do with being European or not. People speak multiple languages on **_every_** continent. It also would not make sense for Pale Moon as it is primarily an English-language product and is not published in multiple languages (which a multi-lingual website would also imply; if you go multilingual you have to go all the way). Language packs are a courtesy for those who prefer a native language UI.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-02T14:28:08.000Z"
}