{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibo7t7qi5ko3chhyk5t4qugahdgoa35jurcqvhqyt54c4nod5uk5y",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmxwm7ino4z2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33480&p=274878#p274878",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-29T06:16:10.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "https://hg-edge.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=eda85618840c3a0fe5f3cf343ccce1a7aeee75bf&tochange=c5ddc463e9f84902a198e1f14dc97fea3bd4fbef"
  ],
  "textContent": "I was unable to discern from page code inspection what's going on (although their entire page is in a flex container with overflow:hidden and a set height...).\n\nDoing a quick mozregressioin though saw the behaviour change on Firefox's end in the following push range:\nhttps://hg-edge.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=eda85618840c3a0fe5f3cf343ccce1a7aeee75bf&tochange=c5ddc463e9f84902a198e1f14dc97fea3bd4fbef\nSomewhere in the 110 range. Maybe someone can find the specific change in that pushlog responsible for it \"starting to work\". I suspect \"Emilio Cobos Álvarez — Bug 1521631 - Implement overflow: overlay as an alias on auto, and enable on Nightly.\"\nNote that overflow:overlay in that bug is marked as non-standard, but got implemented for webcompat anyway. Ultimately though, this would be a perfect example of asking webmasters to please not use non-standard CSS.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Web Compatibility Support • Re: https://windhawk.net/",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-29T06:16:10.000Z"
}