{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihy6ydib46vgv4a4bmtd2qbyeihuawyryusi3ha6bbtskueff4brq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmwv3fzoyc62"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33466&p=274838#p274838",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-28T19:22:13.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> I'm just... feeling like the more I listen to our users as time goes on, the more I understand why Mozilla and other companies turned their back on them, decided they were too hard to please and there are plenty of users they'd be passing up to appease that crowd.\n\nUsers are never happy regardless of what you do. 🙃 That's all very familiar.\n\nI do use Pale Moon a lot in both work and personal life. Its value to me becomes apparent when I try to main another browser.\n\nI'm not sure on the whole modern vs retro aspect. I'd say it's a spectrum thing from my own point of view, depending on what we're looking at it. I mean, you could look at either how browser handles or not handles certain specs, you could look at its UI, you can look at what hardware users prefers or the operating system.\n\nOK, being in IT myself, I do see supporting \"the latest and greatest\" being seen as the \"professional\" thing to do, even if it, from skeptical point of view, may be seen as merely social conditioning. I mean, realistically, wouldn't it be much easier to break some aspect of application on Windows 7 rather than Windows 11? Yet, it's always the latest version of whatever OS that is seen as having to get most care. At least I see it in the way that tackling issues on modern systems is trivial compared to not breaking an older one.\n\nThough I also tend to question old ways of doing things at times.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-28T19:22:13.000Z"
}