{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih2exbf7t47rfkclzoescd7gbhlgoaam6wv6bjhcslqpi4jn6iin4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmwawnsf4js2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=32872&p=274813#p274813",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-28T13:12:04.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "not planning to use it as a built-in adblocker."
  ],
  "textContent": "> Firefox is not planning to use it as a built-in adblocker. It is to experiment with changing some part of the implementation of ETP. (By using RUST!!!  )\n>\n> Mozilla may be slow, inconsistent and misaligned, but they are not idiots. It hasn't been more a couple years since Firefox became the only safe place for uBlock Origin. They may cuck to MV3 someday, but IMO that day definitely isn't coming for at least a few years.\n\nThey may say it's not an ad-blocker but..\n\nAnyway, I just heard that LadyBird is now also adding Brave's Rust-based Ad-Blocker to their browser. Following Waterfox/Firefox. Which means 2 major engines and 1 new engine will be using it. So it'll probably go \"mainstream\" and trickle down to Rebuilds of chromium/firefox. I wonder how that will affect uBlock Origin and ad/content-blocking in general..\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Linux has over 6% of the desktop market",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-28T13:12:04.000Z"
}