{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreib5vjvrt4emxitpqflol7ewx4pamtag35ocuygpnas3wlzrif6pbi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmueiyicqek2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=274770#p274770",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-27T20:15:10.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "**Off-topic:**\n\n\n> Off-topic addendum:\n> I don't want to sound too preachy here, but I feel you guys might suffer far fewer headaches on the Linux side of PM/UXP, if you'd go Slack.\n\nI already use Slackware and have used it for many years. One of the few modern distros still worth using IMO. There was a point where I was building Basilisk releases on Slackware 14.2 for the older glibc support, ended up on EL8 though.\n\n\n> > I have a general roadmap (it isn’t public but I can share it if someone is interested)...\n>\n> I'm interested, if you don't mind telling.\n\nI'll get it in a doc for you, currently it's mostly just handwritten notes and a few text files on my computer.\n\n\n> My question is: are we proposing _to add_ Qt support, or _to replace_ GTK with Qt? (...and, again, I would be fine either way, I'm just looking for clarification.)\n\nIn my branch where I have worked the QT6 stuff, this is a third option in addition to GTK2/3. I didn't remove any GTK2/GTK3 related code.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-27T20:15:10.000Z"
}